Thursday, November 13, 2008

“He’s” Pregnant Again, But It Is Still A Hoax


It was just this past March that RIALW exposed the hoax of a “pregnant man”, revealing that in actuality, this so-called “man” is a lesbian activist living as a man and went to court to have herself declared “male” by judicial decree.

In July we reported that the lesbian couple had given birth to a healthy baby girl, reminding all that the notion of a “man” carrying and delivering a baby, even by ‘C’-Section was not worthy of all the International attention paid to a rather ordinary birth.

Not too unexpectedly, our own media, dumbed down as they are, perpetuated the myth of a pregnant man by bringing on this confused woman, who underwent radical mastectomy and took testosterone, but retained full female genitalia and reproductive organs, to broadcast to the world and our nation that at long last, a man was pregnant with a child.

Thomas Beatie, aka Tracy LaGondino was the hit of the left-winged talk show circuit, making a big splash on the Oprah Winfrey Show, among others, who told us this confused woman’s pregnancy is “a new definition of what diversity means for everybody.”

Now, we have ABC’s Barbara Walters, throwing away what smidgen of credibility she might still have retained by informing the world, Pregnant “Man” Expecting Second Child, in a new interview continuing the myth and blurring the lines between the sexes.

Most ridiculous is that throughout the interview Thomas/Tracie is continually referred to as “he” and “his,” and includes a video beginning with her strategically standing before a mirror, shirtless, flexing her muscles, as if that makes one more masculine.

Included with the article are several photos presumably taken at the lesbian couples home, most with Thomas/Tracie shirtless, as if to drive home to readers that her breasts have been surgically removed.

Walters interview reveals that the birth, first reported to be by Caesarian Section actually wasn’t, a feat physically impossible for any male.

Thomas/Tracie also says of her original story, “I was shocked that it looped around the world in 24 hours,” after Walters tells us she wrote about it in a popular Gay Magazine.

Thomas/Tracie claims to have been living a “quiet life in Bend, Oregon,” but “keeps the blinds drawn and monitors surveillance cameras that surround the property,” due to “death threats” she claims she and her partner receive.

Any pretense of “quietness” is thrown out he window with their desire to stir it up again with yet another public television interview.

Maybe to those on the left this is seen as an “enlightening occurrence,” but Thomas/Tracie reveals her confusion when she was asked why she makes people uneasy and she answered, “I think that people are not used to seeing the image of a pregnant man. And it's causing a lot of people to think,” adding the most confused statement she has ever uttered, “I used my female reproductive organs to become a father.”

Think, if you will, ahead a few years when these children are in school around other children who are born from a man and a woman in a more normal family setting and who know that Daddy is different than Mommie and that Mommies have the babies and Daddy’s place the babies in Mommy. Children can be the coldest and most heartless of all, any parent can tell you that. So, what do you think will happen when one of the couple’s children states that they were born from Daddy?

What sort of confusion will result when the teacher is forced to tell the students that Daddy’s can have babies, when they can’t, and the children go home to tell their parents and it all has to be explained.

I imagine that trying to explain what a ‘blow-job’ was, after Bill Clinton’s affair to Monica Lewinsky was revealed, to a six-year-old will have been easier than trying to explain this one to small children.

The thought of that flies in the face of Thomas/Tracie’s claim of, “We are a man, woman and child. It's ironic that we are so different but yet, we're just a family, just the same as anyone else.”

Not hardly.

In today’s world, even though the majority opposes same-sex marriage, Gay relationships are accepted and most people don’t give them much attention. Lesbian couples have children all the time, becoming impregnated by artificial insemination and giving a normal female birth.

Given Thomas/Tracies history of activism for the Gay lifestyle, I have to suspect that her efforts here are not as pure as she once claimed they were when she said, “Wanting to have a biological child is neither a male nor female desire, but a human desire.”

Such a rapid second pregnancy, after the hoopla died down and making sure she appears on National TV again, takes this beyond just a “human desire to have a biological child.”

I see this more attempts at shoving the Gay Agenda down the throats of heterosexual society as well as blurring the lines between genders even further than they have been.

If Thomas/Tracie isn’t a very confused individual, then she is a very deceitful individual. I don’t care if you believe in Creation, Evolution or Intelligent Design; Male and Female are here for a reason. While in some lower life forms the male might be the child bearer, in the Human species that doesn’t happen naturally.

So long as “HE” retains female genitalia and reproductive organs, it's “SHE.”

Judicial decrees do not over rule the laws of nature. Claiming otherwise and agreeing with it is not only naïve it is down right deceitful.

12 comments:

allee said...

That's what slayed me about it: She kept her reproductive organs. I don't believe that a person suffering from so-called "gender dysphoria" or "body dysmorphic syndrome" will make it a point of keeping their lady junk just to be able to breed - which is exactly what she did.

Court decree does not a male make. Removal of breasts by a surgeon is not a defining moment in the creation of a man (ask any woman who's needed a mastectomy or hysterectomy for cancer if she's now a man) or ingestion of some pills (she stops taking them, the effects begin to reverse). Above all, retaining FEMALE reproductive organs is an automatic preclusion to becoming a "child-bearing man."

And heck, Lew, you don't need to worry about those kids when they get in school. By that time, they should have this all cleaned up, and the rest of us will have been "educated" on how normal and natural and GOOD and RIGHT aberrant behavior of ANY sort is.

Lew Waters said...

Some of "her" comments are what slay me, allee. On ABC's video, she says, "you aren't born a man, you become a man."

What the hell is that? Granted, a boy isn't a man, bu is still male.

As for the education camps, I have .357 reasons I'll never go ;-)

Thomas Davis said...

The problem with having a '.357 solution' is that the first few gays that you kill would probably be easy for you... but from then on, you'll get sick to your stomach and need to design a mechanized method for solving the 'problem' that really only exists in your own mind.

allee said...

I am so sorry, Lew, but I cannot help myself. People like this claim nature's mistake, and I agree: It is a direct result of generation after generation shitting in the gene pool, nature not allowed to filter it out.

Reverse Evolution.

What she is doing is manipulation and deceit, plain and simple. I wouldn't even say "confused." She has an ulterior motive, and it's not about babies or family. Nature has a way of filtering out shit, and people like this just squat and dump in another load, right in plain sight.

I am infuriated by stories like this, "oh, our RIGHTS" waa waaa waaaaaaa; but these same shocktard morons s**t canaries when, oh, say... a Deaf couple wants to selectively choose a deaf embryo for IVF. It's "discrimination" waa waaa waaaaaaa... "forgetting" the fact that these dirty b*****ds blatantly discriminate against Deaf in every way, shape, and form EVERY SINGLE DAY. A Deaf child is CELEBRATED in the Deaf community, for a reason. Deaf parents are often disappointed with the birth of a Hearing child - not the child itself, mind you, but a Hearing child is more likely to shun the Deaf community later at the risk of ridicule by these same morons forcing the community at large to "accept THEIR differences, because nature made a mistake," in the same breath belittling Deaf for THEIR differences. "Broken" and needing to be "fixed," nature "made a mistake" with a Deaf child.

I don't lay all this stupidity at the feet of these people, though. The biggest part lies with the "doctors" who are enablers. Writing prescriptions for drugs, performing operations that are not life-saving. This is a violation of the Hippocratic oath: First do no harm. I have little use for cosmetic surgery but understand and accept a SMALL fraction of it, like reconstructing someone's face after a traumatic accident; that's going to help a person's psyche along with promoting acceptance in mainstream society, so they don't stand out like a sore thumb at the end of the pointed finger of shame and ridicule. Boobs and balls - if not life-threatening - is just unethical.

I caught a program a while back on a doctor who does "sexual reassignment" surgery, a woman who had been a man (and a yummy-fine one at that) with a family, that part of his life excised to become a woman... to then shack up with a woman.

A lesbian transsexual??? Isn't that... A MAN? He needed to mutilate his body to have sex with women?

Crack it open any way you like it. At the end of the day, her CHROMOSOMES still read "XX," a female designation. That can never be redefined, no matter how many hormones you gobble down or whether you've mutilated your anatomy. Nature doesn't make mistakes; it builds on the same foundation it has for all time. Taking a hammer and chisel to the blocks doesn't mean nature made a mistake, it means someone has tried to weaken the foundation. Nature tries to shed the damaged blocks, but when some moron keeps shoving them back in the pile, one or two will slip through and the house will eventually tumble.

Lew Waters said...

Thomas, if you pulled your head back out into the sunshine and studied history a bit, you'd understand my .357 quip. Obviously, it went right over your head, which as low as yours appears to be, wouldn't be hard.

Allee, as I said, nature cannot ever be over ruled by judges or doctors. They are only fooling themselves thinking they can.

What I find disturbing here is that this couple goes out of their way to make their life choice public. Lesbian couples having children isn't rare nor a big deal today, most of us "breeders" just don't care. However, to mutilate yourself as she did and then claim to be a "man" based upon that mutilation is assinine. She doesn't have a clue about being a man any more than I do about being a woman.

I recall many years ago, in Rush's early days, he spoke of a psychologist somewhere that released a theory that it was unnatural for men to be attracted to women and women to be attracted to men. It was claimed that only women can understand another woman, leading to the claim that only a woman knew how to satisfy a woman. This psychologist went on to claim that only homosexuality was actually normal due to her theory.

So, Rush announced that since he finds women attractive, he must be a male lesbian.

Seriously, these people have lost all their sense and giving such notoriety to this couple is sickening.

allee said...

I agree, 110%. Mutilating herself does not make her a man, but she's not going to stop until she gets her way - regardless of what her chromosomes say. There's always going to be someone (why do they always seem to be psychologists??) who boldly claim that thousands of years of nature are wrong and we have to think outside the box - as long as there's money in it for them to keep saying it.

(And I got your .357 quip, Lew) :P

Lew Waters said...

While I do not think Thomas/Tracy is aware of or doing whatever it is she intends to accomplish with this, allee, the support she receives from segments of society ties in perfectly with parts of what Florida Representative A. S. Herlong read into the Congressional Record back on January 10, 1963, 45 points the Democrat indentified then as Current Communist Goals

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

I doubt most are even aware of or believe this list and imagine libby's that see this will just poo poo it, but looking back over the years, I see how the "ptogressive" movement has been promoting actions of people like Thomas/Tracy as "normal" and even, "preferred."

allee said...

OMG, Lew, I was just reading that list after being pointed there from another article on another topic, and that same thought was niggling in the back of my mind!

Dude, you are SO awesome!!!!

And I can't put myself in the position of seeing her motives as benign; she knew what kind of response she was going to get with leaking the news so quickly about a second pregnancy, on top of the gloating (sorry, but that's how I see photo after photo passed around of this woman post mastectomy, running the circuit of talk shows, like trying to rub our nose in the fact that she has been adjudicated and, therefore, must be accepted as a man - ovaries and uterus notwithstanding). Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm just hardheaded, but until I see some action from this woman to convince me otherwise, I sit right here in that chair.

Lew Waters said...

Yes, allee, there is an activist's motive behind her actions. It is so much more than just a lesbian couple having a child.

The amount of photos showing her bare chested after her mastectomy, the TV interviews to announce the second pregnancy, the original article in a nationally syndicated Gay magazine and all the attention they draw to themselves screams activism.

At one time, whoever the judge is that decreed her a male would have been tarred and feathered and ridden out of town on a rail.

allee said...

You're probably right on that one (about the judge). What I don't understand is, how did that judge feel it appropriate to go that far when SHE had so blatantly not gone FAR ENOUGH? I mean, had she gone the steps to truly "become a man" (genital reconstructive surgery) I could see it; but she did NOT. By retaining her lady bits, she is no more a man than any other woman having undergone mastectomy for medical purposes or taking hormones to alleviate a medical condition.

Like that doc I mentioned before. He went the whole 9 yards to become a woman, has female genitalia and did not keep his male junk in order to preserve his reproductive capabilities; in that case, I could see a judge making that decree - this guy didn't just go haphazardly into the realm of sexual transformation, ya know? I don't see any such justification in this case. Maybe it's just me...

Lew Waters said...

When they originally decided to get Thomas/Tracy pregnant, the first doctor they visited recommended a visit to a counselor or psychiatrist.

Of course, he was just a homophobic bigot for stating the obvious.

As for the judge, this is what activist judges are about. They don't uphold the law, they pervert it, along with their cronies at the ACLU (founded by a known and admitted communist, if you didn't know).

allee said...

Actually, I didn't know that about the ACLU - until I was pointed in that direction by that earlier article I mentioned. I was kind of shocked, to put it mildly. Ahhh, the things they don't teach in public schools, even 20-some years ago when I had the privilege of attending and things were slightly more "open"... (We were actually given Creationism as a theory in school, briefly and not in-depth, obviously, but in stark contrast to the evolution end-all-be-all of today.)

As for the doc who suggested a counselor, that's SUPPOSED to be part of the protocol before someone is allowed to undergo sex change to begin with, so does that make the docs who developed the program enabling sex change homophobes as well, for not only suggesting it but REQUIRING it?

Personally, I could care less what they do in the privacy of their own homes; but when they start forcing their beliefs onto others (including the children they will be indoctrinating - and no one is going to give me a line about how they will allow their children to make up their own minds about what is right and wrong because we all know THEIR way is the only RIGHT way in their eyes) is when they begin to cross the line and infringe upon my right to teach my own children in the manner I see fit. Theirs is not my life to live or to control, but it is appalling they refuse the same courtesy to me and mine.

I gotta climb off my soapbox now. I am ranting like a loon. But thanks for the great info, Lew.